 |
| Sand Tufa at Mono Lake |
They thought
physics was dead more than a hundred years ago. Before Max Planck postulated the
quantum. Before Einstein explained the photoelectric effect. Long before dark
energy and dark matter. And way, way before double-charm tetraquarks!
From Quanta
Magazine: “The unexpected discovery of the double-charm tetraquark
highlights an uncomfortable truth. While physicists know the exact equation
that defines the strong force … they can rarely solve this strange, endlessly
iterative equation, so they struggle to predict the strong force’s effects.”
I love it that
physicists are stuck with an equation they can rarely solve, that physics is
not dead, and that nature is still bending minds, thank you very much. The
writer goes on to explain that the tetraquark they discovered was surprisingly
stable—because it lasted 12 sextillionths of a second!
And here I am
thinking a flash sync of 1/250th of a second is blink-of-an-eye fast.
Of course in the context of atomic physics it would be ridiculous to even call
a blinking eye “fast.” Anything that took as long as an eye-blink to happen
would probably put a particle physicist to sleep!
A tempting
internal hyperlink in the above article took me to a page about protons, which
reminded me of a Star Trek: Next
Generation episode that I recently watched on Amazon Prime (“When the Bough
Breaks”). When this kid who’s maybe 12 years old was scolded by his dad for
ditching his calculus homework, I hoped that they would eventually show the kid
why calculus is useful. Alas, they missed their chance. Maybe the writers
themselves didn’t know either.
Not only did
we not learn calculus when I was in 7th grade (the year after Apollo
11 landed on the moon), we didn’t learn about quarks either, much less
tetraquarks. An atom was a neutron, plus protons and electrons, and that was
that. So I thought it was funny when the linked
article started out saying, “We learn in school that a proton is a
bundle of three elementary particles called quarks—two ‘up’ quarks and a ‘down’
quark, whose electric charges (+2/3 and -1/3, respectively) combine to give the
proton its charge of +1. But that simplistic picture glosses over a far
stranger, as-yet-unresolved story.”
I love that the
proton story I learned about has become passé, but you’ll have to read the
article to see how mind-blowing the “as-yet-unresolved story” is. How intricate
and mysterious this beautiful world is.
 |
| October Sunrise, Mono Lake |
* * *